check left right search DRI on Facebook DRI on X (Formerly Twitter) DRI on YouTube DRI on LinkedIn DRI on Instagram login join pay dues
Skip to main content

Profile - James B. Slaughter - Bio

James B. Slaughter

Company Information

Beveridge & Diamond PC
1900 N Street, NW
Suite 100 Washington, DC 20036
(202) 789-6040
Member Bio
Jimmy Slaughter has a national practice in environmental, toxic tort and constitutional litigation. Recent accomplishments include securing a unanimous win in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court defeating toxic tort claims, Gilbert v. Synagro Central, ___ A.3d ___, 2015 WL 9282354 (Dec. 21, 2015) and a defense judgment after a three week trial on tort claims alleging Mr. Slaughter's client supplied corrosive water to apartment buildings, Cormier v. D.C. WASA, 2011 D.C. Super. Lexis 7, 84 A.3d 492 (2013), which Mr. Slaughter successfully defended on appeal. Mr. Slaughter also scored three wins on preemption claims in 2013 and 2014 before the California Court of Appeal and the Washington Court of Appeals involving solid waste issues. Mr. Slaughter has tried numerous jury and bench trials and argued cases before many federal and state appellate and trial courts across the country, including the California, District of Columbia, Pennsylvania and Virginia supreme courts.

Mr. Slaughter is recognized as a leader in litigation involving drinking water, wastewater and biosolids over the last twenty years. His representation of cities, farms, contractors, and trade associations on waste issues spans toxic tort, enforcement defense, and complex constitutional and administrative law issues regarding competing federal, state and local authority. Mr. Slaughter speaks regularly at meetings of the Water Environment Federation, its state affiliates, and the National Association of Clean Water Agencies. He works with the country’s top microbiologists, odor scientists, and fate and transport experts to defend his clients in the courts and before agencies.

Toxic tort defense is a significant part of Mr. Slaughter's practice, including defense of wrongful death, serious personal injury and nuisance claims. He has handled the country’s most significant cases involving alleged public health impacts from land application of biosolids and from allegations of lead in drinking water. Mr. Slaughter regularly and successfully challenges plaintiffs’ medical and causation experts under Daubert and Frye.

Mr. Slaughter is nationally recognized for his success in preemption and commerce clause challenges to discriminatory and burdensome local legislation. Mr. Slaughter led a coalition of electronics trade groups and manufacturers in challenging the constitutionality of New York City's recycling and product-take back mandates. After Mr. Slaughter filed a motion for preliminary injunction, the City agreed to stay implementation of the law. He also led the successful efforts of the City of Los Angeles to overturn a local ban on the City’s use of its biosolids on California farmland as a fertilizer on Commerce Clause and other constitutional grounds.

Superfund litigation is a major part of Mr. Slaughter's docket and he has defended and prosecuted CERCLA claims around the country. Since joining Beveridge & Diamond, Mr. Slaughter has led several PRP Group representations and won a major successor liability ruling in Pfohl Brothers Landfill Site Steering Committee v. Allied Waste, 255 F. Supp. 2d 134 (W.D.N.Y. 2003). Mr. Slaughter's CERCLA practice focuses on complex, expert-driven liability and allocation issues in litigation, arbitration and mediation settings. He has overcome repeatedly the common challenge in CERCLA cases of proving liability for hazardous waste disposal from generations ago.

Mr. Slaughter also litigates and arbitrates cases under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), focusing on the defense of the rights of data owners against follow-on registrants of pesticides. He was co-counsel with other Beveridge & Diamond Principals in the landmark case of Cheminova A/S v.Griffin L.L.C., 182 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C 2002), which underscored that data compensation awards pursuant to FIFRA’s mandatory arbitration scheme are fully enforceable in court.

Mr. Slaughter joined Beveridge & Diamond after three years as an Assistant and Senior Assistant Public Defender in Fairfax County, Virginia. While with the Public Defender's Office, Mr. Slaughter successfully defended against a capital murder indictment in Commonwealth v. Reed. Before joining the Public Defender's Office, Mr. Slaughter clerked for the Honorable James Sprouse of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Mr. Slaughter is active in the ABA Section of Litigation, the Defense Research Institute, the National Waste & Recycling Association (NW&RA), the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA), and the Water Environment Federation (WEF). He speaks and writes frequently on litigation and environmental law topics.

He currently serves on the program committee for the Defense Research Institute Toxic Tort and Environmental Law Seminar, is Co-Chair of the Mass Environmental/Toxic Torts Subcommittee of the Environmental Litigation Committee of the ABA Litigation Section, and is the past Co-Chair of the Water Subcommittee and RCRA Subcommittee.

Mr. Slaughter holds an AV rating from Martindale and has been selected for inclusion in Super Lawyers Editions 2014 and 2015.

Recent significant cases tried or argued by Jimmy Slaughter:

Barkley v. DC Water, 2016 WL 184433 (D.C. Super. Ct. 2016)
Gilbert v. Synagro, ___ A.3d ___, 2015 WL 9282354 (Pa. 2015)
Barkley v. DC Water, 2015 D.C. Super. LEXIS 8 (D.C. Super. Ct. 2015).
SPRAWLDEF v. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, 172 Cal. Rptr.3d 110 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)
Gilbert v. Synagro, 90 A.3d 37 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014), appeal granted, 101 A.3d 1149 (Pa. 2014)
Washington Department of Ecology v. Wahkiakum County, 337 P.3d 364 (Wash. App. 2014), review denied, 2015 Wash. LEXIS 467 (Wash. 2015)
City of Los Angeles v. Kern County, 328 P.3d 56 (Cal. 2014)
Northern California Recycling Association v. County of Solano, 2014 WL 235443 (Cal. App. 2014)
Sierra Club v. Solano County, 2013 WL 3963602 (Cal. App. 2013)
Cormier v. D.C. Water and Sewer Authority, 2011 D.C. Super. Lexis 7, 139 DWLR 2157 (D.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 30, 2011)
Potrero Hills Landfill, Inc. v. Solano County, 657 F.3d. 876 (9th Cir. 2011).
Cormier v. D.C. Water and Sewer Authority, 2011 D.C. Super. Lexis 2 (D.C. Super. Ct. May 10, 2011)
Hardin v. Jackson, 625 F.3d 739 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
Hardin et al. v. Jackson, 648 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 2009)
Cormier v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, 2009 D.C. Super. Lexis 1 (D.C. Super. Ct. July 27, 2009)
Hardin v. EPA, 600 F. Supp. 2d 13 (D.D.C. 2009)
Wyatt et al. v. Sussex Surry LLC, 2007 Va. Cir. Lexis 182 (Surry Co., Va. Cir. Ct. November 2, 2007)
City of Los Angeles et al. v. Kern County, 2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis 81696 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007)
City of Los Angeles et al. v. Kern County, 509 F. Supp. 2d 865 (C.D. Cal. 2007)
Wyatt et al. v. Sussex Surry LLC, 482 F. Supp. 2d 740 (E.D. Va. 2007)
City of Los Angeles v. Kern County, 462 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (C.D. Cal 2006)
City of Los Angeles v. Kern County, 2006 WL 3073172 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2006)
SRM Chemical Ltd. v. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, 355 F. Supp. 2d 373 (D.D.C. 2005)
Synagro v. Rush Township, 299 F. Supp. 2d 410 (M.D. Pa. 2003)
O’Brien v. Appomattox County, 293 F. Supp. 2d 660 (W.D. Va. 2003)
O’Brien v. Appomattox County, 2003 WL 21711347 (4th Cir. 2003)
Pfohl Brothers Landfill Site Steering Committee v. Allied Waste Systems, Inc., 255 F. Supp. 2d 134 (W.D.N.Y. 2003)
Pfohl Brothers Landfill Site Steering Committee v. Browning-Ferris Industries of New York, Inc., 221 F. Supp. 2d 406 (W.D.N.Y. 2002)
O’Brien v. Appomattox County, 213 F. Supp. 2d 627 (W.D. Va. 2002)
Synagro v. Rush Township, 204 F. Supp. 2d 827 (M.D. Pa. 2002)
Cheminova A/S v. Griffin L.L.C., 182 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2002)
Firm Information
Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. was established in Washington, DC in 1974 by a small group of attorneys who practiced environmental and corporate law. Since that time, we have become the largest and one of the oldest firms in the nation that concentrates its practice in all aspects of environmental law and litigation. Among the Firm's current attorneys and alumni are the first Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the first Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, two former EPA General Counsels, several other former federal and state agency officials, and numerous U.S. Department of Justice attorneys with experience in all types of litigation and contested proceedings.

The Firm soon developed a reputation for excellence in the field of environmental law. As landmark pieces of federal and state environmental legislation were passed in the 1970s, the Firm's environmental practice steadily grew and it quickly became known for its depth in all areas of environmental law. Today, we believe that ours is the preeminent environmental practice in the United States. In the 1980s, Beveridge & Diamond saw considerable growth in all of its practice areas and it opened a second office in New York City and a third office in New Jersey. Its client base expanded to encompass virtually every industry sector. To meet the demand of its nationwide client base, the Firm opened an office in San Francisco in 1989. That growth continued into the 1990s with the opening of an office in Baltimore as well as expansion into practice areas such as biotechnology, white collar crime, and insurance coverage. The firm now has offices in Boston and Austin as well, and its various practices are organized into three main practice groups--Environmental Law, Land Use, and Litigation.

No content found

No content found

No content found

Practice Areas
Appellate Advocacy
Commercial Litigation
Mass Tort
Toxic Torts & Environmental Law
DRI Committees
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Toxic Torts and Environmental Law

Social Profiles

There are no social profiles defined.